From 23 hours of screening to a ranked shortlist in 2 minutes.
Paste the JD. Upload the resumes. Get a ranked shortlist with evidence — in under 2 minutes.
For recruiting agencies · in-house talent teams · independent recruiters
3 of 12 ranked · view full diagnostic below ↓
Works alongside your ATS — no integration, no API keys, no migration
See it work
Paste, extract, rank — no signup required
The full flow, replayed here. Tap any stage, or let it play.
Inside a ranking
Open any candidate. See the full diagnostic.
Qualification checklist with evidence quotes, interview transcript analysis, keyword coverage. Every ranking has receipts.
Jordan Mills identified as candidate — speaks first and consistently refers to personal ownership of infrastructure described on the resume
Demonstrated SkillsSkills from the job description that the candidate actively backed up with specific examples during the interview.
- Walked through a real multi-region EKS outage with clear ownership of the recovery — credible and specific, matches resume claims
- Articulated CI/CD architecture decisions with reasoning on trade-offs; referenced the 400-engineer GitHub Actions pipeline directly
- Demonstrated working knowledge of AWS cost optimization beyond surface-level answers — gave specific numbers from a previous cost-reduction initiative
Gaps AddressedResume weaknesses or missing areas that the candidate clarified or provided new context for during the interview.
- Team leadership gap from resume analysis partially resolved — candidate has mentored two junior engineers and led incident response, though no formal direct reports yet
Unsupported ClaimsResume strengths the candidate couldn't back up, contradicted, or walked back when questioned during the interview.
- Resume mentions 'chaos engineering familiarity' but candidate could not name a specific tool or describe a real fault injection exercise when asked directly
Notable ResponsesStandout moments from the interview — specific answers that were particularly strong, revealing, or memorable.
When pushed on scaling beyond current team size, gave a thoughtful answer about delegation patterns and hiring bar — signals leadership readiness
Proactively flagged a limitation in their CloudFormation knowledge without being asked — honesty is a good sign
CommunicationHow clearly and effectively the candidate communicated — structure, conciseness, and command of language.
Concise and technically precise. Answers stayed on-topic without prompting. No rambling, no over-explaining. Strong communicator for a senior IC.
Overall AssessmentOverall evaluation tying interview performance to role fit, referencing specific things the candidate said.
Resume score holds up under interview scrutiny. The chaos engineering gap is confirmed but candidate is self-aware about it. The leadership gap is smaller than the resume suggested. Recommend advancing to the team-fit round.
Seven years of dedicated DevOps experience across fintech infrastructure, with direct Kubernetes cluster management and CI/CD pipeline ownership at scale. The strongest alignment is in AWS and Terraform — the gap is in chaos engineering practices the JD lists as preferred.
Strengths
- Kubernetes at Scalehigh"Manages 30+ EKS clusters across 4 AWS regions" maps directly to the JD's multi-region cluster requirement.
- CI/CD Pipeline Ownershiphigh"Built GitHub Actions pipelines supporting 400+ engineers" — the JD asks for 500+, but the architecture transfers.
Gaps
- No Team Lead ExperiencedealbreakerThe JD requires managing a team of 3–5 engineers. The resume shows IC work only — no direct reports or people management mentioned.
- No Chaos EngineeringsignificantThe JD lists Gremlin or Litmus as preferred. No mention of chaos practices anywhere on the resume.
- CloudFormation GapminorThe JD lists CloudFormation alongside Terraform, but the candidate's IaC experience is Terraform-only.
Keywords
Experience Alignment
Seven years exceeds the five-year minimum. Staff-level scope aligns with the senior IC role. Fintech infrastructure background is a direct match for the industry context.
Overall Assessment
Strong shortlist candidate. The Kubernetes and CI/CD depth directly answers the core of the JD. Chaos engineering is a preference, not a requirement — worth probing in the technical screen rather than screening out.
AI-generated assessment — not a professional evaluation or predictor of hiring outcomes.
Features
Built to defend your shortlist
Every feature is designed so you can answer the question "why is this candidate at the top?" in one sentence — with evidence.
Evidence-backed fit scores
Every 0–100 fit score is backed by quoted evidence from the resume — so you can justify every rank to a hiring manager.
MATCH / PARTIAL / MISS checklist
A qualification checklist per requirement. Not a black-box number — a defensible breakdown you can walk anyone through.
JD calibration before scoring
Review and adjust the AI-extracted requirements before any resume is processed. Promote, demote, remove, or add criteria to match exactly what you're hiring for.
Interview transcript analysis
Upload interview recordings for evidence-based evaluation. See who actually demonstrated their resume claims — and flag unsupported claims automatically.
Privacy by default
End-to-end encryption at rest. No training on your data. Sessions expire automatically. Your candidate pool stays yours. CSV + PDF export included on every plan.
All rankings are AI-generated decision-support. Final hiring decisions should always involve qualified human review.
The honest comparison
Why not just use LinkedIn Recruiter or your ATS?
You can. Here's what you give up, and what you get. No hand-waving — side-by-side capabilities.
Looking for a specific alternative? See all comparisons →
How it works
From job description to ranked shortlist in 3 steps
No integration, no API keys, no CSV templates. Paste a JD, upload resumes, get ranked results.
Paste your job description. Optionally review and adjust the AI-extracted requirements before any resume is processed — promote, demote, or add criteria to match exactly what you're hiring for.
Upload your candidate pool of resumes. Every candidate is processed in parallel.
Get a ranked list with fit scores, match verdicts, qualification checklists, and evidence quotes — in under 2 minutes on average. Interview transcript analysis and CSV + PDF export included.
Why we built this
Every recruiter we know spent the first 60 minutes of every req skimming the same resumes everyone else had already skimmed. Not reading — skimming. Looking for the one signal that would let them move on to the next.
We built Resume Autopsy so that 60 minutes becomes 2. Not AI that makes hiring decisions — AI that shows its work, so every shortlist you present is one you can defend line by line. Evidence quotes. Match / partial / miss per requirement. The same questions a hiring manager will ask you, answered before they're asked.
What recruiters say
“Finally, an AI screener that explains itself”
A verified 5-star review from a recruiter on G2 — the world's most trusted B2B software review platform.
“Finally, an AI Screener That Actually Explains Its Logic”
Most AI screening tools give a 'match score' without explaining why, which makes it hard to trust the results or explain them to a hiring manager. This tool provides a transparent Qualification Checklist for every candidate — it identifies exactly where someone meets, partially meets, or misses a requirement. This data-driven approach gives me much more confidence when presenting a shortlist to my team.
Verified User in Computer & Network Security
Small Business · April 2026
Pricing
Transparent pricing. Cancel anytime.
Start free with no credit card. Upgrade when you're ready. No per-seat fees, no annual contracts, no sales calls.
Try it free first — 1 session, 3 candidates, no card required.
Free Trial
Free
3 candidates / session
1 session lifetime
Best forTrying it on one real req before committing
✓Evidence-backed fit scores
✓Qualification checklist (MATCH/PARTIAL/MISS)
✓PDF report
✓Interview transcript analysis
Starter
$29/mo
8 candidates / session
15 sessions / month
Best forSolo recruiters running 1–3 reqs per month
✓Evidence-backed fit scores
✓Qualification checklist (MATCH/PARTIAL/MISS)
✓PDF reports + CSV export
✓Interview transcript analysis
✓Candidate notes & status tracking
Pro
$59/mo
15 candidates / session
30 sessions / month
Best forAgencies and in-house teams running 5+ reqs per month
✓Everything in Starter
✓PDF reports + CSV export
✓Interview transcript analysis
✓Candidate notes & status tracking
✓Priority processing
All plans — including the free trial — include qualification checklists, PDF reports, interview transcript analysis, and CSV export. Paid plans cancel anytime.
Cancel anytime. No lock-in. No sales call required.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Free Trial — No Approval Required
Your next hire is in that pile.
Let's find them.
Sign in with Google. No approval wait, no sales call, no credit card.